I am
on vacation in the beautiful, North Carolina mountains, and, because I have no
guilt wasting time on vacation, I dedicated an exorbitant amount of time
tilting at windmills on Facebook yesterday, and I rode away into the night
feeling as valiant as Don Quixote himself. Dang it feels good to be a gangster.
Am I right, Quixote?
Now
I sit writing an article for my blog that I don’t have much intention in ensuring
a lot of people read. Again, this is just some catharsis with no guilt for
wasting time. I must admit, most of my blog posts are like this. Anyway…
I
say most of this in jest, of course, because I have had several occasions in
which someone has told me that my thoughts helped him or her and brought his or
her thinking around on whatever happened to be the topic at hand, and I too
have had moments like this myself. I’m just trying to be honest with myself. I
know for the most part, my Facebook posts and blogs will do little to change
the world.
I’m
ok with that. Yet, I will add this: When I do have something burdening my heart
enough that I write about it on my blog, you can be assured that it is
something that I pray about and work at solving in ways I find more meaningful
than simply jotting down some thoughts online. When I say I do not think my
words will change the world, I do not suggest I do not want the world to
change, and I do work on doing my part in being a problem solver.
Now,
onto the matter at hand:
The
hot topic yesterday was, of course, the NFL allowing its players to take a knee
during the National Anthem. What are we to make of all of this?
I
can say this: We won’t properly make
heads or tails of this event if current emotional outrage drowns out reasoned
discussion, and I see it on both sides. One side is saying, “You disrespect
men and women who have died for you, you ungrateful piece of trash,” while the
other side screams, “You are a racist pig wanting to silence minorities and you
can’t even think your way out of a wet, brown paper sack.”
That
is our first problem. People do not know how to disagree.
You must understand this, my beloved: let everyone be quick to listen,
slow to speak, slow to anger… James 1:19
It
takes time to understand an argument, but, in our culture, we take the shortcut
of asking ourselves, “On what end of the political spectrum would this fall?”
If the issue falls on the other side from where we stand (as we perceive it) it
is automatically bad, and if it falls on our side (as we perceive it) it must
be defended at all cost. No time to think in a fast paced world. We must make
quick assumptions. We must prejudge.
So,
whatever side one falls on, if one’s initial response is to quickly pick a side
and call those on the opposing side “fools,” “idiots,” “trash,” “ingrates,”
“morons,” or a bunch of other words I saw but won’t repeat here (let’s not
forget Son of a bitch, coming from our most hallowed of public offices,
however), then we have a problem.
They
may be acting foolish, but have we even tried to first be listeners of their
grievances? Have we been slow to anger? Again, people on both sides have been
guilty of this. I cannot say that within my heart, I haven't had a few names for
people, and for that, I am sorry.
But I say to you that if you are angry with a brother or sister, you will be liable to judgment; and if you
insult a brother or sister, you
will be liable to the council; and if you say, ‘You fool,’ you will be liable to the hell of fire. Matthew 5:22
The
key to being able to learn is to avoid anger. I have to admit, this is hard.
When issues of justice are at stake, sometimes it is not possible to go all
Spock, full of reason with a great measure of detachment, but it is worth
trying.
Let’s
begin with the major claims being made:
On
the one hand, and this narrative has changed very little, except for a little
twist after POTUS called those NFL players who continue to kneel “Son of a
bitch,” those NFL players taking a knee have consistently said that they are
trying to bring attention to the fact that the nation, which is supposed to be about
“liberty and justice for all,” is failing certain peoples. Admittedly, it did
shift a bit in recent days to include a protest against Trump for his calling
certain NFL players a derogatory phrase. But, the central message remains
intact.
There
are two groups of people: Those who have heard and believe this is, at least
for the most part, the intended message. Then, there are those who refuse to
believe the express explanation and suggest this is all about disrespect for
the country.
(Now,
give me time to be fair to all sides, as far as I think I can be without
betraying my own beliefs, before giving up on me in the paragraphs ahead.)
It
is a matter of proper dialogue and debate to give the benefit of the doubt to
the person when he or she says, “This is what I mean.” Until it can be shown
otherwise, not with small anecdotal evidences, but clear proof that an ulterior
motive exists, it is proper for debate to let someone’s words be his or her words.
Understand those words and attack them, not some made up conjecture.
On a
number of occasions, the players have expressed that they mean no disrespect to
the service men and women, nor are they trying to be unpatriotic. They are
trying to do something for the nation (call out injustice within) not do something
against it (support anarchy). The whole idea of kneeling was an attempt to show
deference for the service men. When Colin Kaepernick first began this protest,
he sat during the anthem. He then consulted a peer who had served in the armed
forces and this peer told him that taking a knee would be more respectful for
service men, while still getting his point across. He did just that.
That
is the narrative.
On
the one hand, to say this has absolutely nothing to do with the anthem and flag
is misguided. The protest time was carefully picked to make a very pointed
point about our nation.
What
these players, however, wish to say is that they
believe in their hearts that the flag represents more than the military, as
it should. They are not protesting these men and women who fight for the flag,
hence, the knee instead of just sitting. They are protesting a certain part of
our nation’s current state.
Along
with partly being a symbol of the military, the flag represents the entirety of
the country and her people (“And for the Republic for which it stands”), and
these men do not think our nation is living up to the ideal of “liberty and
justice for all.” In other words, they are not, in their hearts, trying to pull the nation down, but to call her
up to what she is supposed to be about.
So,
yes, the flag and anthem are a part of this, but they are saying that those who
are calling them out for being unpatriotic are missing the point. I think this
is a fair argument on their part, especially in light of recent events in which
many who now cast blame on the kneeling players were making a similar claim
just a month prior:
Consider
the phrase I used a few times: “in their hearts…”
One
month ago, people were saying: “In our hearts, the confederate statues
represents something deeper than the hate you are making it out to mean,” and
they wanted this argument to be heard.
Presently,
many of these same people are saying: “I don’t care what you say is in your
heart when you protest, I say it is hateful towards the military.”
We
cannot have it both ways.
If
all the flag can represent for a person is our military, then that person is
dangerously conflating the two. The military does not own the flag. The
military serves the nation for which it stands and protects her in service. Do
I stand in honor of these men and women? Yes, I do. But, if it is demanded of
me to do so in a compulsory manner, then there is a problem.
When
we begin to demand people act and behave as we wish, we begin a slippery slope
to all sorts of chaos. Remember, Richard Dawkins is leading a massive movement
of secularists who believe religion in all forms is dangerous and therefore
should be prohibited. When we tell people how they should express their deepest
beliefs through certain prohibitions (I prohibit you from kneeling), then we
join the ranks of people like Dawkins.
Now,
for a moment, let’s switch gears.
On
the other hand, to be completely shocked and angry that some people would take
offense to the mode of protest is a bit misplaced as well. Many persons were
raised to believe that patriotism is one of the greatest positions one can take
in this life, short of their allegiance to God. (I happen to think these come
too close to each other sometimes, but that, again, is the topic of another post).
Furthermore, they were told that any deviation from standing with hand over
heart during the pledge and the anthem is disrespectful.
The
very intent of picking the time of the anthem as the time to protest was meant
to cause a stir. So, that people are stirred up is understandable. What then
needs to happen for those who would want to say, “Wait a minute, just hear
clearly the reason for protest out before you get too insulted,” is for these
persons to be very patient in giving this message. It may take a bit of time
before the others can calm down. They were provoked.
If
people are purposefully provoked, then the ones provoking might have to take a
few lashes if they want to be heard.
It
is not a terrible move to provoke people. Jesus was provocative, and he
explained himself to those who truly wanted to learn. So, if you are going to
poke the bear, be ready to explain yourself when he comes out mad as a hornet,
and don’t be surprised that you may have to spend a little time calming the
bear down (and not in a patronizing way either).
It
isn’t fair to be provocative and then say, “What are you mad about?” On the
other hand, it is not unreasonable to do something bold to awake the giant,
either. Again, you just have to take the time to receive a little lashing,
before you can be heard saying, “Let me tell you why I woke you up. I need you
to hear something, and I could not get your attention nicely. I mean no
disrespect, but I could not get your full attention any other way.
Could
there be a better way? Maybe, but the point now is that it has happened, and if
they stop now, the naysayers are going to do their “I told you so" dance… It’s
a pickle for sure.
Now
to my final two thoughts:
If
you are the sort of person who will say, “I hear what they are saying, but I do
not believe them.” In other words, you say that you have listened, but there is
really nothing of substance to their grievances (i.e. minorities are not
oppressed in any way), I would ask, have you done any research, or are you just
not willing to believe our nation could overlook people? Having that sort of
faith in our government then means you should never complain about anything
going on in congress. If they have our best interest in mind at all times, then
do not complain about healthcare, taxes, or abortions. Just read a little bit
of history, and remember that the ripples of history don’t disappear the day,
week, year, decade, or even century after they were made.
If I
can say that my success is in part due to what my ancestors did way back in the
1700s, then others can say that oppression that only ended decades ago has some
bearing on their life now. Furthermore, it is not just about what happened
then. There are still injustices today (link below).
And, if you are the sort of person who would
say, but they are rich and therefore have no right to complain. They should be
grateful. I would warn that this comes very close to racism. “You can’t
complain about minority injustice, because we gave you the ability to play
football….” Really?
Did
you hear that Saudi Arabia finally passed a law allowing women to drive? I
guess those women have nothing more to complain about. They should be grateful
to their benevolent nation, right?
For
more on minorities and injustice read this:
https://chartwellwest.com/2017/09/27/__trashed-2/
Finally,
if your love of tradition outweighs your willingness to listen to the other
that is a huge conflict, especially for the Christian. If your love of country,
flag, and anthem, means you cannot stop for a moment and listen when someone is
saying they are in pain, you need to take time to reevaluate your priorities.
Pain
often expresses itself in nasty ways. Think of a loved one who has gone through
a mental breakdown. If their pain is expressed in shouts and screams that you
do not like and may think are unwarranted, would you then say, “I will not
listen or try to help.”
I am
not saying that the pain of the minority community is equal to the above
illustration. I am saying that, even if some do not like how it is expressed
(by what mode and through which representatives), that should not mean we allow
our anger at what might be perceived as an insult to control our response,
which should always be first motivated by loving patience and a willingness to
listen, despite what the other is doing.
Otherwise,
tradition undermines love:
Then he said to them, “You have a fine way of rejecting the commandment
of God in order to keep your tradition! Mark 7:9
